XjcHostCheck

java.lang.Object
- google.registry.xjc.XjcObject
- - google.registry.xjc.host.XjcHostCheck

```
public class XjcHostCheck
extends XjcObject
```
<p>Java class for mNameType complex type. <p>The following schema fragment specifies the expected content contained within this class. <pre> <complexType name="mNameType"> <complexContent> <restriction base="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}anyType"> <sequence> <element name="name" type="{urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eppcom-1.0}labelType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </sequence> </restriction> </complexContent> </complexType> </pre>

- Field Summary
  
  Fields
  Modifier and Type Field Description
  
  protected java.util.List<java.lang.String> names
- Constructor Summary
  
  Constructors
  Constructor Description
  
  XjcHostCheck()
- Method Summary
  
  All Methods Instance Methods Concrete Methods
  Modifier and Type Method Description
  
  java.util.List<java.lang.String> getNames()
  Gets the value of the names property.
  - Methods inherited from class google.registry.xjc.XjcObject
    marshal, toString
  - Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object
    clone, equals, finalize, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, wait, wait, wait

- Field Detail
  - names
```
protected java.util.List<java.lang.String> names
```
- Constructor Detail
  - XjcHostCheck
```
public XjcHostCheck()
```
- Method Detail
  - getNames
```
public java.util.List<java.lang.String> getNames()
```
    Gets the value of the names property. <p> This accessor method returns a reference to the live list, not a snapshot. Therefore any modification you make to the returned list will be present inside the JAXB object. This is why there is not a <CODE>set</CODE> method for the names property. <p> For example, to add a new item, do as follows: <pre> getNames().add(newItem); </pre> <p> Objects of the following type(s) are allowed in the list String